Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management, still widely called F&O, is Microsoft's ERP for organisations with many legal entities, countries, warehouses and plants. It is powerful, and it rewards a disciplined implementation more than most.
We implement, upgrade, integrate and support F&O, with Power BI, Power Platform and Azure delivered by the same team.
Finance, Supply Chain, Project Operations and Commerce on Microsoft's cloud.
Many legal entities, currencies and tax regimes on one platform.
Upgrade from Dynamics AX 2009 and 2012 to the cloud.
Power BI, Power Platform and Azure on the same team.
An F&O programme touches finance, supply chain, data and integration at once. They are staffed together, because the problems cross between them.
Finance, procurement, inventory, warehouse, production and project operations designed with Microsoft's Success by Design approach and configured to standard first.
Global design and local rollouts, so each new country is a template rather than a project.
A design that scales to the next entity.
Dynamics AX 2009 and 2012 estates assessed, code reviewed, data upgraded and customisations rebuilt as extensions on F&O.
Customisations classified as keep, rebuild, replace with standard or retire.
Off an unsupported platform without rebuilding the past.
Master data, open transactions and balances migrated with the Data Management Framework, rehearsed and reconciled.
Data quality is fixed in the source before it is moved.
Opening balances that agree on day one.
Banks, tax engines, warehouse and transport systems, ecommerce, CRM and legacy applications connected through Dataverse, APIs and Azure Integration Services.
Built with monitoring and replay, because interfaces fail.
Integrations you can support.
Financial reporting, Power BI on F&O data, and Power Apps and Power Automate for the steps F&O does not cover.
Extensions built outside the core, so updates stay routine.
Reports people act on, and fewer spreadsheets.
Functional and technical support, Lifecycle Services and environment management, and regression testing of Microsoft's service updates.
One team for the ERP, the data and the integrations around it.
Service updates without disruption.
How an F&O programme runs
Typical F&O scope. Most programmes start with finance and supply chain and add the rest by entity or phase.
| Module | Scope | Common integrations | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance | GL, AP, AR, fixed assets, budgeting, consolidation | Banks, tax engines | Project or managed |
| Supply chain | Procurement, inventory, warehouse, transport | WMS, carriers, suppliers | Project or managed |
| Manufacturing | Discrete, process and lean production | MES, quality systems | Project |
| Project operations | Project accounting, time, expense | PSA, HR | Project |
| Reporting | Financial reporting, Power BI | Data lake, warehouse | Project or managed |
Multi-entity ERP programmes fail when every entity becomes its own implementation. Local variations accumulate and the global design quietly disappears.
We design a global template first, decide which local differences are legal requirements and which are habits, and roll entities out against that template. Each rollout is faster than the last.
Talk to a Dynamics expertScope and plan are set after assessment.
Business Central suits small and mid-sized businesses that want a fast, simpler ERP. F&O suits larger organisations with many entities, countries, warehouses or manufacturing complexity. The assessment answers this with your requirements, not a product preference.
Yes. AX 2012 and AX 2009 estates are analysed, data is upgraded and customisations are rebuilt as extensions or replaced with standard features. Much of what was custom in AX is standard in F&O.
Updates are applied in test first and regression suites run against them, so issues are fixed before production is updated.
Yes. We review the environment, extensions, integrations and open issues first, then take on support with a documented baseline.
Yes. Some groups run Oracle in one region and Dynamics in another. We support both and integrate them.
Or stuck on AX. Tell us the entities and systems involved, and the assessment produces a blueprint you keep either way.